PeerBerry vs Robocash: Short-Term Consumer Loans Compared 2026

Two consumer-loan platforms with multi-year track records, group concentration, and buyback guarantees - which one fits your risk appetite?

PeerBerry vs Robocash comparison chart showing regulation, yields and originator concentration

TL;DR: PeerBerry vs Robocash in five bullets

  • Regulation: PeerBerry holds pending ECSP registration (Bank of Lithuania); Robocash is unregulated.
  • Yields: PeerBerry approximately 11 percent; Robocash 9-13 percent depending on term length.
  • Originator structure: PeerBerry sources from Aventus Group (multi-market presence); Robocash provides 100 percent of loans from its own group.
  • Track record: PeerBerry repaid EUR 51 million in Ukraine-exposed loans in full; Robocash honoured buyback since 2017 without interruption.
  • Liquidity: Both rely on buyback; PeerBerry plans secondary market launch in 2026; Robocash offers 60-day guarantee with no secondary market.

Quick comparison table

Feature PeerBerry Robocash
Advertised yield ~11% 9-13%
Minimum investment EUR 10 EUR 10
Regulation ECSP pending (Bank of Lithuania) Unregulated
Investor protection None (unsecured creditor) None (unsecured creditor)
Buyback guarantee 60 days overdue 60 days overdue
Secondary market Planned 2026 No
Auto-invest Yes Yes
Operating since 2017 2017
P2PScore rating 8.0 (Tier 2) 7.4 (Tier 2)

PeerBerry at a glance

PeerBerry operates from Zagreb, Croatia, and holds pending European Crowdfunding Service Provider registration with the Bank of Lithuania. The platform sources consumer loans, leasing contracts and real-estate-backed notes from Aventus Group, a multi-market lender active in Latvia, Kazakhstan, Poland and Georgia. PeerBerry advertises approximately 11 percent average annual yield across its loan portfolio, with a 60-day buyback guarantee covering late payments.

PeerBerry demonstrated balance-sheet strength in 2022 and 2023 by repaying EUR 51 million in Ukraine-exposed loans in full after the Russian invasion disrupted collections in that market. The platform plans to launch a secondary market in 2026, offering investors an alternative exit route before loan maturity. Ownership overlaps with Crowdpear, another ECSP-registered platform focusing on real-estate development loans.

Read the full PeerBerry review and score breakdown.

Robocash at a glance

Robocash operates from Zagreb, Croatia, without financial regulation or licensing. The platform provides 100 percent of its loan inventory from Robocash Group, a Singapore-headquartered consumer-finance conglomerate active in the Philippines, Indonesia, Vietnam, Spain, Kazakhstan and India. Robocash offers 9-13 percent annual returns on short-term consumer loans with 14 to 90-day maturities, protected by a 60-day buyback guarantee.

Robocash has honoured its buyback commitment continuously since 2017, including during the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2022 Eastern Europe market disruptions. The platform charges no fees for deposits, withdrawals or auto-invest. Robocash does not offer a secondary market; investors depend on the buyback guarantee for liquidity before loan maturity.

Read the full Robocash review and score breakdown.

Returns compared

PeerBerry advertises approximately 11 percent average yield, calculated across consumer, leasing and real-estate loan categories. Robocash offers a sliding yield scale from 9 percent on 14-day loans to 13 percent on 90-day commitments. Both platforms report realised returns close to advertised figures because the 60-day buyback guarantee converts late loans into performing assets at par value plus accrued interest.

Robocash pays interest daily, compounding automatically when reinvestment is enabled. PeerBerry accrues interest daily but transfers it to the investor account at loan maturity or when a note is sold on the secondary market (once launched). Neither platform charges account fees, withdrawal fees or auto-invest fees, so net yields equal gross yields minus applicable withholding tax in the investor's jurisdiction.

Regulation compared

PeerBerry holds pending ECSP registration with the Bank of Lithuania, subjecting the platform to prudential supervision, originator due-diligence standards, and transparent disclosure rules under the European Crowdfunding Service Providers Regulation. ECSP registration does not create a deposit-insurance or investor-compensation scheme; investors remain unsecured creditors of the originating loan companies.

Robocash operates without a financial licence or regulatory supervision. The platform is not registered as a crowdfunding service provider, investment firm or payment institution. Investors at Robocash hold no statutory protection beyond their contractual claim against Robocash Group for buyback execution. The platform publishes quarterly financial summaries but is not required to file audited accounts with a national regulator.

Risk compared

Both platforms concentrate origination within a single corporate group. PeerBerry sources all loans from Aventus Group, a multi-market lender with operations in four countries. Robocash sources 100 percent of its loan inventory from Robocash Group, headquartered in Singapore with lending subsidiaries across six emerging markets. If either group becomes insolvent or suspends buyback funding, investors face principal loss regardless of the buyback guarantee in the platform's terms.

PeerBerry's ECSP registration introduces regulatory oversight of originator relationships and requires the platform to maintain separation between client funds and operational capital. Robocash's unregulated structure offers no such separation. PeerBerry's EUR 51 million Ukraine loan repayment in full demonstrates access to group capital under stress; Robocash's eight-year unbroken buyback record shows operational consistency but has not yet been tested by a major originator default or market dislocation.

Neither platform holds a MiFID II investment-firm licence, so neither qualifies for the EUR 20,000 investor-compensation scheme available at Mintos or Nectaro. Investor compensation never covers borrower defaults - only platform insolvency or fraud.

Which to choose

Choose PeerBerry if:

Choose Robocash if:

Skip both if:

Frequently asked questions

PeerBerry holds pending ECSP registration and demonstrated solvency by repaying EUR 51 million in Ukraine-exposed loans in full. Robocash remains unregulated but has honoured its 60-day buyback guarantee continuously since 2017 across all market conditions. PeerBerry offers structural transparency via multi-originator diversification; Robocash depends entirely on the health of its parent group, Robocash Group.

PeerBerry advertises approximately 11 percent average yield across consumer, leasing and real-estate notes. Robocash offers 9-13 percent on short-term consumer loans, with the higher rates tied to longer commitment periods. Both platforms honour buyback guarantees, so advertised yields approximate realised returns when originators remain solvent.

PeerBerry plans to launch a secondary market in 2026. Robocash does not offer a secondary market; investors rely on the 60-day buyback guarantee for liquidity. Both platforms allow withdrawals to a personal bank account within a few business days after selling loan positions.

PeerBerry holds pending ECSP registration, which will subject it to Bank of Lithuania supervision and require transparent originator due diligence. Robocash operates without a financial licence and is not supervised by a national regulator. Investors at both platforms remain unsecured creditors without deposit insurance or investor compensation schemes.

Yes. PeerBerry offers auto-invest with filters for originator, loan type, and maturity. Robocash provides auto-invest with term-length selection (14, 30, 60 or 90 days) and automatic reinvestment of principal plus interest. Both platforms charge zero fees for auto-invest.

Bottom line

PeerBerry and Robocash both deliver short-term consumer loans with 60-day buyback guarantees and eight-year operational histories. PeerBerry edges ahead on regulatory transparency via pending ECSP registration and demonstrated capital strength through its EUR 51 million Ukraine loan repayment. Robocash offers a longer unbroken buyback record and slightly higher maximum yields but carries full concentration risk within a single unregulated group.

Investors seeking ECSP oversight and originator diversification across four markets will prefer PeerBerry. Investors prioritising the longest buyback track record and daily compounding will favour Robocash. Both platforms remain Tier 2 in the P2PScore index - suitable for diversified portfolios but not as standalone core holdings.

Risk warning: Capital is at risk. Returns are not guaranteed. Buyback guarantees depend on originator solvency. Neither platform offers deposit insurance or investor compensation schemes.

Ready to compare short-term consumer platforms?

See how PeerBerry and Robocash rank against all 20 platforms in the P2PScore index - scored monthly on regulation, defaults, structure and track record.

View full rankings